| |
MUSTARD OR
SOYA? The Future of India's Edible Oil Culture
Dr. Vandana Shiva
Published by Navdanya, A-60 Hauz Khas,
New Delhi 110 016, pp.40, October 1998In August 1998, mustard oil
adulteration in India led to a series of deaths due to
dropsy. An immediate ban was announced on
mustard oil sales in India and on all edible oils sold
unpackaged.
Indias food diversity is in a large measure based
on oilseed diversity. Different regions consume mustard,
coconut, groundnut, sesame, linseed, safflower etc. 80%
of the edible oil is processed in the small-scale sector
on ghanis which operate on tiny amounts of
capital but provide pure and nutritious oil to consumers
locally.
The ban on mustard and on unpackaged oil is equivalent to
a death sentence to Indias oilseed diversity, food
cultures and small-scale industry. While the indigenous
oil industry is being pushed to extinction, a food and
crop monoculture is being created through free imports of
soyabean, and a shift from diverse edible oils grown and
processed locally to a few crops grown globally and
processed in large-scale industrial systems.
The shift from diversity to monocultures is also a shift
from economic democracy to monopolies - from ownership of
seed to control over trade and processing. The shift from
diverse and decentralised food systems is justified on
grounds of food safety. But food safety is not
guaranteed, since industrial oils in general, and
soyabean in particular, bring their own health hazards.
New hazards are also being introduced through genetically
engineered soyabean.
Because of the power of the soyabean and the
biotechnology industry, consumers are being denied
information on these food hazards. They are also being
denied the right to know that they eat and the right to
choose what they eat, by resistance to labelling. Recent
studies have concluded that excessive concentrations of soya
interfere with the absorption of vitamins and minerals in
the digestive tract, particularly with the breakdown of
protein. Because they contain a high level of oestrogen,
they have serious impacts on reproductive health, on the
development of the foetus, and can cause sterility. Soya
products have also been linked with cancer of the
pancreas. In addition to these hazards, soya that has
been genetically engineered increases allergies and
resistance to antibiotics. There is a high probability
that the soya that is imported from the US is genetically
engineered. Further, the new varieties of soya that are
being pushed by the MNCs in the seed industry are also
genetically engineered. In view of these finds, the
replacement of the domestically popular oils like mustard
and groundnut with soya on a large-scale can be hazardous
to the health of the Indian people.
In a very real way,
the mustard oil crisis in India reveals how the consumers
across the world are being denied the right to food
democracy, and are being coerced to participate in a food
totalitarianism and food monoculture. Keeping mustard oil
alive is thus becoming central to an agenda for genuine
economic freedom for small producers and poor consumers.
It is to contribute towards building links between
biodiversity, cultural diversity and economic democracy
that Navdanya has published this short report.
The Navdanya research team consisted of Ms Maya Jani,
Afsar H. Jafri, Dr. Jyotsna and Gitanjali Bedi. Navdanya
(nine seeds) is a national programme for the conservation
of agricultural biodiversity and the promotion of
sustainable agriculture initiated by the Research
Foundation for Science, technology and Ecology.
Navdanya is accessible on
Ph. 6968077, 6853772,
Fax: 011-6856795. E-mail: vshiva@giasdel01.vsnl.net.in
Internet: http://www.ipsil.com.vshiva/
[top] [index]
|