| |
Mathew Nampudakam looks after the Consumer
Cell in VHAI.
Restoration of health is a complex process which involves
medical as well as non-medical factors such as nutritious
food, sufficient rest, clean water, healthy environment
etc. Elimination of disease-causing micro-organisms from
the body with the help of medicines is no guarantee for
good health. In fact, the health status of a person and
the community improves strictly in proportion to the
improvement in the above factors. The overall health
improvement witnessed in many developed countries of the
world in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was
certainly because of improvements in the living
conditions. This resulted in the disappearance of many of
their public health problems. Interestingly, these things
happened much before the discovery of the wonder-drugs -
antibiotics. Is pumping in more and more
medicines into the sick person a remedy for his/her
ill-health? If it were so, we would have been healthier
now, considering the advancements in the drug industry
over the years.
Unfortunately the
emphasize seems to be not on improvement in basic health
conditions but on higher productivity for larger profits.
This is why the drug industry has proliferated so much
but the health status has not made corresponding strides.
Social conditions like increasing population, pressure on
the limited resources, unregulated urbanization etc.
aggravated public health problems leading to enhanced
morbidity and mortality. Simultaneously the demand for
more drugs and hospitalization also increased. Trying to
fish in troubled waters, the drug manufactures responded
to the situation by producing and selling lot of useless,
irrational, unscientific, hazardous and costly medicines
at the expense of essential drugs which always remained
in short supply. Because, for them the former was
economically more viable than the latter.
Doctors unaware of the questionable scientificity of such
drugs begin to prescribe them indiscriminately to the
detriment of consumer interests. They think that by
giving a long prescription they can improve their image
and competency. Obviously some ignorant patients would be
misled to believe that more the number of drugs (and
costlier), better the care. But in the process, what was
not evident was the irrationality of the doctor on the
one hand and the damage from unnecessary medicines to the
patient on the other, apart from the colossal waste of
resources. Antibiotics, tonics, restoratives, cough
syrups and pain-killers are medicines prescribed by some
doctors recklessly.
The Tonics culture
Patients are made to believe that tonics,
mixtures of B-complex vitamins in solutions of sugar and
alcohol, are the short-cuts to good health. Many people
do not know that enough nutritious food, sufficient rest
and acceptable lifestyles are the best restoratives and
not tonics. A balanced diet takes care of the need for
vitamins, minerals and other nutrients. Tonics comes in
the form of capsules, tablets or flavoured liquids. The
nutritive value of tonics are insignificant compared to
their cost. In short, such commercial preparations, some
of which may not even include correct proportion of
vitamins and minerals, cost many times higher than they
are really worth.
Tonics are available in the market for everybody, for all
sorts of real and assumed debilities, like chronic
diseases, loss of appetite, weight loss, fatigue etc.
Tonics can cure none of these problems. The worst case is
tonics for the newborn babies, who do not need any food
for normal growth, other than breast milk for the first
four months of life and home-made supplements, beyond
that period.
There is no valid scientific reason for these tonics to
be produced, as no authentic medical textbooks recommend
their use. Tonics are not all that safe either. Excess
intake of vitamin A and D can harm the user. It is
hazardous to use tonics containing caffeine, strychnine,
leptazol etc. Tonics and health restoratives do not find
a place in the rational drug policy of Bangladesh.
England does not regard tonics as drugs.
The sale of tonics in India is 12 per cent of total sales
of pharmaceutical products. In an UNCTAD study in 1977,
it was found that 34 per cent of all drugs sold were
tonics, tranquilizers and cough mixtures.
Dr. S.G. Kabra advises his fellow doctors "do not
prescribe the so-called tonics. They improve the health
of the manufacturer and not the health of the
patient".
Cough up for no
cure
Nobody can escape getting a cough once in a
while. The reasons for this can be many. It may be caused
by a simple cold or by more serious infections like TB.
As people look for quick remedies, the attractively
packed, highly advertised cough syrups come handy for the
practitioners. Cough syrups and expectorants are widely
prescribed and used by people even without medical
consultations. There are two kinds of preparations in the
market; cough syrups and expectorants. Cough syrups are
meant to subsidize coughs and expectorants are meant to
help the body to throw out sputum from the throat by
inducing cough. So they have opposite actions. The drugs
which stimulate coughing are ammonium chloride, ipecae,
etc. and those which suppress coughing are codeine,
noscapine etc. Antihistamines that dry the secretions
like benadryl, piriton, avil etc. are also generally
included in these preparations.
It is ridiculous to mix both the groups of drugs in the
same preparation. This is irrationality of the worst
kind. It has no pharmacological support and hence WHO
essential drugs list omitted them. Bangladesh has banned
all cough syrups and their combinations. As some of these
preparations contain addictive properties (habit
forming), their prolonged use may do more damage than
good by causing stomach upsets, drowsiness etc.
Chloroform present in many of these cough syrups, may
damage the liver and may even cause cancer.
Pain-killer- an
easy kill
Pain-killers are another group of widely used
irrational drugs. They are supposed to suppress the
feeling of unbearable pain in the patient. Some of these
pain-killers have the potential to knock out the patient.
They do not remove the cause of the pain, but removes the
symptom and gives a false sense of relief. Certain
pain-killers contain caffeine in small quantities. There
are also some other pain-killers which are combinations
of analgesics and vitamins. They have been already banned
from use as they do not increase the therapeutic value,
but just increases the cost. With about 40 million poor
people in India, who do not even get adequate food, it is
nothing but a crime to promote tonics, cough mixtures,
tranquilizers and such other avoidable substances. Can
any amount of these products cure the problem of poverty?
With a perennial drag in health financing and an acute
shortage of essential drugs for the diseases of poverty
like TB, Malaria, Kala Azar etc. India has valid reasons
to stop promoting unessential medicines. How much of a
national waste it is to continue to produce such huge
quantities of irrational and useless medicines? Strict
actions should be initiated against false and misleading
claims made in drug advertisements. The well-developed
Indian pharmaceutical industry should heed to the health
needs of the consumers. Bold initiatives are needed to
weed out unwanted preparations and to step up production
of essential drugs needed for rational and
people-oriented health care programmes. Consumer groups
should warn the gullible public about the machinations of
vested interests working overtime. They should campaign
for rational prescription practices by the doctors and
initiate action against those who sell banned or
hazardous drugs and those who administer such drugs. A
radical change in the concept and approach are overdue.
When will the end user of drugs, the consumer, start
calling the shots?
The
Health Action International (HAI) a network of
international consumer organisations has
documented the following facts:
- out of 546
products in the market for coughs and
colds, 83% per cent are irrational
combinations;
- more than
three quarters of the 888 vitamin
preparations in the market are either
irrational, ineffective or in incorrect
dosage and could not be recommended for
use;
- three-quarters
of the 356 analgesics on the market
should not be recommended for use because
they are dangerous, ineffective,
irrational or needlessly expensive;
- 73% of the
217 non-steriodal anti-inflammatory drugs
(NSAIDS) on the market could be removed
because of their poor safety records,
their lack of significant therapeutic
advantage and their much higher cost over
safer products.
|
[top] [index]
|