Will WHO succumb to commercial interests? In the document published by the World Health
Organization (WHO) Drug Action Programme, titled
Globalisation and access to drugs: implications of
the WTO-TRIPS agreement serious concern has been
expressed that the prices of drugs, under stronger patent
regimes, will go beyond the affordability of vast
sections of the population in low income countries.
Later, while drafting the Revised Drug Strategy, the main
document to be discussed in the World Health Assembly
(WHA) this year, the Executive Board of WHO was unanimous
in stating the following resolutions:
To ensure that public
health, rather than commercial interests have
primacy in pharmaceutical and health policies and
to review their options under the Trade Related
aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS)
agreement to safeguard access to essential drugs.
To assist member
states in analyzing the pharmaceutical and public
health implications of agreements overseen by the
World Trade Organization (WTO) and to develop
appropriate policies and regulatory measures.
These two particular
clauses irked the rich north block and the strong
pharmaceutical industry lobby. While the United States
and some other governments, including Germany, opposed
the clauses, African countries and health activist groups
decided to support the resolutions. In order to avoid
public squabble, it was decided that a special group
would prepare a compromise resolution for the WHA.
However, despite negotiating for 20 hours over 5 days,
the group failed to reach a consensus. WHA referred the
draft back to the Executive Board and thus the issue was
left for discussion in the next year. Even this decision
was passed by 29 votes in favor and 18 against. African
nations complained that there was lack of quorum during
voting.
It is a matter of serious concern that the premier global
health forum is still dithering over prioritizing public
health safeguards over commercial interests. Developing
countries have already started suffering due to the
system whereby prices of drugs are escalating rapidly.
In this issue we have tried to place the drug price
escalation scenario in India in perspective. The
Government, which is the largest single buyer in the
country, has not taken effective steps to check upwardly
spiraling drug prices. Unlike the developed countries,
the Indian Government has not even tried to bargain with
the industry in a coherent manner to ensure supply of
drugs at uniform and reasonable rates. Purchases by the
central government, state governments and defense
organizations are made without inter-agency coordination.
With its limited capacity an organization like CDMU can
negotiate drug prices directly with manufacturers and
ensure that they supply drugs at prices at least 30%
lower than market rates. Why cant the Indian
government take a concerted approach and not backtrack on
its own resolutions? We are also eagerly waiting to see
that WHO overcomes the pressure from vested multinational
industry interests and prioritizes public health goals
over commercial considerations. Amitava Guha
This site would be best viewed on a Netscape 4.0 Gold or above and Microsoft IE 4.0 or above with screen settings of 800 x 600 and true colors option checked.