| |
3-11 RHEUMATIC FEVER
An excellent review diagnostic criteria,
epidemiology, treatment, and prevention. See the
abstract. Reference
Article
3-11 RHEUMATIC FEVER
In many developing countries, rheumatic heart disease
remains the leading cause of heart disease among children
and young adults.
In developed countries many young physicians have never
seen a patient with rheumatic fever (RF). They find
themselves making decisions about whether cephalosporins,
rather than penicillin therapy alone, constitute
appropriate primary prevention therapy, and whether or
not antibiotics are necessary for pharyngitis.
This seminar emphasizes the importance of early diagnosis
and reporting of a patient with RF, because such a
patient can introduce into the community strains of group
A streptococci that are capable of causing the disease.
These strains are known, appropriately, as rheumatogenic.
Diagnostic
criteria:
Have not changed since the Jones criteria were
introduced in the 1950s.
Polyarthritis of RF generally occurs early in the
rheumatic attack, at a time when streptococcal antibodies
are at their peak concentration. The absence of a
substantial increase in antibodies (eg, antistreptolysin
O and anti-DNase), is a useful negative predictor for RF.
Carditis is a pancarditis that is invariably associated
with murmurs of valvulitis. Isolated myocarditis or
pericarditis that is not associated with murmurs should
not ordinarily be diagnosed as rheumatic in origin. Thus,
a rheumatic carditis can be easily diagnosed by
auscultation.
Sydenhams chorea, when florid, is easily
recognizederratic, jerky, purposeless movements,
fleeting local muscular weakness, emotional liability,
and personality changes. There are no confirmatory
laboratory or imaging tests. Diagnosis is based entirely
on clinical signs. If mild, chorea is commonly over
looked and attributed by teachers and parents to
behavioral and emotional disorders, restlessness, and
clumsiness.
Epidemiology:
Group-A streptococci have been identified as the
sole etiologic agent. But not all group-A streptococci
cause the disease. (A fact that is still not widely
appreciated.) Extra pharyngeal infections with group-A
(pyodermas and soft tissue infections) are not
rheumatogenic. And not all pharyngeal infections lead to
RF. Some serotypes of group A strep do not cause RF. Some
M serotypes have been clearly associated with RF (M 5
& 18). A subclass of surface proteins on
rheumatogenic M serotypes cross react with heart tissue,
synovium, and brain. Susceptibility to recurrences of RF
might result from an acquired autoimmune response to an
initial pharyngeal infection with a rheumatogenic strain
of group-A streptococci. The response is amplified by
subsequent bouts of infection. Progress in identifying
the antigenic M-peptides promises development of a
vaccine to prevent RF.
Recurrence of RF as well as primary attacks all but
disappeared in certain populations long after penicillin
prophylaxis has stopped. This occurs after rheumatogenic
strains have also disappeared.
Some strains are nephritogenic (causing
glomerulonephritis) generally those with primary
tropism for the skin. There is a clear separation of the
microbiology of the two diseases.
While the decline in RF has been attributed mainly to
socioeconomic advances and prophylactic penicillin, there
has been no decline in incidence or prevalence of
streptococcal pharyngitis. The decline was the result of
the disappearance of rheumatogenic strains.
Rheumatogenic strains are highly contagious. Rapid
transmission occurs by close person-to-person contact.
Treatment:
For the present, most physicians choose to use
corticosteroids rather than salicylates simply because
they are more effective anti-inflammatory treatment for
relief of symptoms. It has not been determined, however,
whether corticosteroids reduce the frequency of rheumatic
heart disease.
The reviewer considers corticosteroids not to be
appropriate for most cases of RF. They should be given to
only a small minority of patients for whom the powerful
suppression of inflammation achieved by corticosteroids
may seem beneficial.
Prevention:
Has remained largely unchanged. Epidemics of RF
in army and navy bases have been terminated by giving all
personnel 1 200 000 U penicillin G benzathine
(bicillin-LA).
Primary prevention: In communities with a high prevalence
of RF, penicillin G benzathine is usually the first
choice, because of poor compliance with 10-day regimens
of oral penicillin. In developed countries, where the
threat of RF is diminished, oral penicillin V has become
the norm. Throat cultures or tests for group-A antigen on
throat swabs provide a useful negative predictive test.
In settings where RF is rare, negative tests can exclude
at least 90% of patients with sore throats from the
requirement for antibiotic therapy. False positive tests
are the result of non-group-A strep, previous group-A
infections, or subclinical acquisition of
throat-colonizing strains. Treatment of these infections
with low doses of penicillin, however unnecessary, may do
little harm, whereas an assault on them with
broad-spectrum antibiotics may contribute to the
emergence of common pharyngeal strains that are resistant
to most antibiotics, such as S pneumoniae.
About 6-29% of patients treated with recommended regimens
continue to carry group-A streptococci after clinical
recovery. But by this time group-A streptococci have
rapidly lost M protein and virulence, and thus their
threat to contacts. Pharyngeal carriage persisting after
adequate penicillin therapy does not pose a threat in
populations from which rheumatic fever has disappeared.
Secondary prevention:
A monthly injection of 1 200 000 U penicillin G
benzathine is the most effective regimen for patients at
greatest risk for recurrence. After 5 years, prophylaxis
can be safely stoppedwhen the original strains of
rheumatogenic streptococci have disappeared from the
community.
Lancet March 29,
1997; 349: 935-942 Narrative review from Boston Univ.
Mass.
[index]
|