| |
4-10 THERAPY FOR BLEEDING PEPTIC ULCERS
Some patients may benefit from initial treatment with
proton-pump inhibitorswhen therapeutic endoscopy is
not available or impractical, when endoscopy is too
risky, or the patient cannot co-operate.
"Although the findings reported in the preceding
study are promising it is premature to recommend the
routine use of proton-pump inhibitors for patients with
bleeding peptic ulcers." NEJM April 10, 1997; 336:
1091-93 4-10
THERAPY FOR BLEEDING PEPTIC ULCERS
(This editorial comments and expands on the
preceding article)
The widespread use of aspirin and NSAIDs, even
at low doses taken to prevent cardiovascular disease, has
increased the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.
In 70%-80% of patients with upper gastrointestinal
bleeding, the bleeding stops spontaneously. The care of
these patients includes administration of blood and
fluids, establishment of a definite diagnosis, and
medical therapy. Patients with continued or recurrent
bleeding pose the greatest challenge. Prompt endoscopy is
now routinely used.
Therapeutic endoscopy has about an 80% efficacy in
stopping bleeding. In general, the various techniques
have similar efficacies. Surgery is reserved for patients
who have torrential bleeding or whose bleeding cannot be
controlled by endoscopy.
The role of medical therapy remains uncertain. Although
histamine H2-receptor antagonists are still routinely
used in the initial care of patients with acute upper
gastrointestinal bleeding, they provide little immediate
benefit, if any. Proton pump inhibitors, which
dramatically suppress gastric acid production have the
potential to be effective treatment. Studies of
omeprazole have been conflicting.
Some patients may benefit from initial treatment with
proton-pump inhibitorswhen therapeutic endoscopy is
not available or impractical, when endoscopy is too
risky, or the patient cannot co-operate.
"Although the findings reported in the preceding
study are promising it is premature to recommend the
routine use of proton-pump inhibitors for patients with
bleeding peptic ulcers."
NEJM April 10, 1997; 336: 1091-93 Editorial from
Univ. Of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester
Comment:
Is optimal treatment: 1) endoscopic evaluation and
treatment (if indicated) alone, or 2) endoscopic
evaluation and treatment (if indicated) plus a
proton-pump inhibitor? I would vote for 2).
This illustrates an interesting point. We can learn much
from our colleagues in different countries. A study
comparing omeprazole with placebo without endoscopic
treatment could not be done in the US. It would be
unethical because it is not the best treatment available.
In India, where endoscopy is not generally available, the
study would be ethical. RTJ
[index]
|